Disruptive Women in Health Care

Subscribe to our blog posts:

or RSS

Subscribe to our announcements:

Please leave this field empty

Join us for Disruptive Women's 2010 Breakfast Series
NEW! Disruptive Women's Online Store

A new meaning for super-size

February 10th, 2010

a-new-meaning-for-super-size

During this blizzard of 2010, I thought about the difficulties an ambulance would have reaching someone in need on an unplowed street—let alone if the person were significantly obese and hard to transport on even an ordinary day.  Then today I read an astounding Washington Post article that noted “a patient between 400 pounds and 600 pounds is part of every workweek for many crews throughout the [DC metro] region.”  Really? I thought this only happened on occasion in select areas shown on the Discovery Channel.  Apparently, not the case.

Emergency medical crews are making hefty investments (no pun intended) in super-sized, ambulatory equipment.   According to the article, “sales of stretchers designed specifically for very large patients were expected to reach $50 million in 2012, up from $29.6 million in 2004, while sales of specialized lift systems were projected to rise from $75 million to $193 million.”

And, it is interesting that just as healthcare spending is rising at a faster rate than the U.S. economy overall, the rate of morbidly obese patients who are at least 100 pounds overweight is increasing faster than obesity as whole, according to a RAND study.

What is more alarming is that, for the first time ever in U.S. history, children may have a shorter lifespan than their parents, and much of the reason is due to obesity and its related health problems.  More than 23 million children (one third of all children and adolescents in the country) are overweight or obese and at greater risk for Type II diabetes and other chronic, life-threatening health conditions.

So, how can we keep our children from ending up in super-sized stretchers one day?

In a previous post, I discussed environmental factors that hinder our ability as a nation to stay un-obese, so I’ll expand on that with some ideas I’ve heard in the classroom.

One suggested strategy has been a soda or sugar-sweetened beverage tax.

  • Studies show that obesity decreases as the prices of unhealthy foods and drinks increase and that this is especially true for children, who are price-sensitive.  In addition, many of the parents responsible for purchasing soda for children in the first place would also be price-sensitive, which is important, since parents are key agents of change when it comes to childhood obesity.
  • The tax funds could be used to target other types of obesity prevention programs.   According to one report, a national tax of one cent per ounce of soda would generate at least $14.9 billion in the first year—an amount 30 times larger than what the nation’s largest funder of childhood obesity work spends in 5 years.

Another proposed strategy has been menu labeling, which would help both consumers to make more rational food choices and restaurants to make healthier ingredient decisions for some of their products.

  • Dining outside of the home comprises more than 45% of food dollars spent in the United States, per the USDA, and these meals have higher calories, fat, and sodium and fewer nutrients than those prepared at home.  And despite the fact that some Americans prefer to select healthier foods when eating out, studies show that the majority of people cannot always discern between healthy and unhealthy food choices.
  • Evidence shows that packaged food labeling is associated with eating more healthfully, and the provision of nutrition information for away-from-home foods could also positively influence food purchases. According to the American Heart Association, a study of existing menu labeling policy in New York City shows that more than 80% of people viewed the change positively.
  • Meanwhile, menu labeling laws have also prompted some restaurants to make nutritional changes in food, now that the information is publicly available.

Finally, kudos to our First Lady for heading the Let’s Move campaign that seeks to resolve the childhood obesity epidemic by the next generation. 

Those are just a few ideas in which I have seen a lot of discussion—what else can we do?

And, how do we address the short term question of keeping adults out of super-size stretchers?

Related posts:

  1. National Hispanic Medical Association (NHMA) Part of Obama’s Let’s Move initiative to battle childhood obesity
  2. Top Posts For February 2010
  3. Poll: Calorie Information on Restaurant Menus
  4. Eating our Way to Better Health
  5. Childhood Obesity: The Time for Action is Now

7 Responses to “A new meaning for super-size”

  1. no1healthtips (Victoria H) Says:

    Twitter Comment


    Disruptive Women in Health Care » Blog Archive » A new meaning for … [link to post]

    Posted using Chat Catcher

  2. Mike Clark Says:

    Hey Lisa

    I found your comments fascinating. Not sure
    that laws and taxes are going to help, laziness and overeating are
    awfully pervasive in our culture — although as a nation we have made
    some progress against tobacco use. There are also some unanswered
    questions such as plastic molecules in our food mimicking estrogen,
    hormone additives to beef, and long term effects of fluoridated water
    supplies. But looking for horses rather than zebras, when you consider
    the leading cause of death (heart disease) and the largest advertisers
    on television (fast foods), well…

    The good news is last time I went to McDonald’s, they had salad on the
    $1.00 menu.

    Cheers
    Mike Clark

  3. amistaff (Meredith Juengel) Says:

    Twitter Comment


    Hospitals investing in over-sized stretchers (for 400+ lb people). Great ideas @disruptivewomen to min child obesity [link to post]

    Posted using Chat Catcher

  4. Lisa Korin Says:

    Thanks Mike – great points!

    And the part about the salad gets at how menu labeling would people attempting to eat healthfully to discern between healthy and unhealthy foods. I’d suggest doublechecking the fat content of that salad and selecting the grilled chicken sandwich or snack wrap next time. http://www.mcdonalds.com/usa/eat/nutrition_info.html

  5. Glenna Crooks Says:

    Lisa,

    Great post.

    And it’s not only ambulances. Funeral homes are doing likewise with hearses and I’ve heard of funeral services being delayed because sufficiently large caskets are not always available.

    Surely as a nation we can turn this around!

  6. Mike Clark Says:

    I have been on the road and mickey d’s is ever-present, fast and cheap. I did check out the dressings, and newman’s own light italian is available, the $1.00 salad itself is lettuce and tomato.

    If I can toot my own horn for a moment, I publish http://www.caloriechart.info, which includes a rundown of fast-food restaurants calorie and fat content numbers — the info may be a little dated, they change their products so often, but it does cover the bases pretty well. I wrote the site when I was on a diet and could not find much in the way of one-click calorie charts. I would appreciate any feedback that might make the site more useful.

    Cheers
    Mike

  7. Lisa Korin Says:

    Regarding the menu labeling strategy, there is actually language in the national health reform law to implement it. http://healthcarereform.nejm.org/?p=3278

Leave a Reply